Update: Mutiny now available on more platforms


Mutiny episode 1 coverThis is just a quick, albeit important update. I’ve decided to expand the reach of my writing and am in the process of publishing Mutiny; Episode 1 on a few other platforms, including Kobo and iBooks. The Kobo version is already live and you can check it out here. Of course, the Kindle edition is also still available on Amazon.

So whatever ebook platform you prefer, chances are Mutiny will be available to you.



Update: Mutiny as a series


Mutiny episode 1 coverIt’s been a while. Actually more than a while. I’ve decided to pick up the pen again. I started with my masters degree this year, so fiction writing, blogging and book reviewing has taken a back seat.

After making the mistake of rushing Mutiny into publication and then realising it had a few flaws, I finally decided to polish it a bit and relaunch Mutiny in the form of a series.

Mutiny, a short story has been re-imagined as episode 1 of the series. I am currently working on episode 2. The ending of Episode 1 has been improved and I corrected a terrible mistake (which you can learn more about from the only person who has reviewed Mutiny on Amazon – a review which I deserved). The updated cover also now says “Episode 1”, beneath the title.

The upcoming episodes will also be shorter forms of fiction, but not as short as episode 1. They will be more like novelettes or novellas. I also plan on compiling the complete series then into an omnibus.

You can  find Mutiny: Episode 1 on amazon by clicking here

Announcing my first publication


Mutiny_Cover_Front_Wikus_Rev5Hi readers.

I would just like to announce that I’ve launched my first publication – a short story. It is about a man who wakes up on a ship without knowing how or why. He soon discovers that the world has changed severely since he last remebered.

You can check it out here on amazon.

I also have some more ideas for reviews coming up, including at least one nonfiction book review.

Research and technical details in fiction


Source: Wikimedia Commons

Fiction writers are often well-known for delving into research, but I’m sure many a reader has found technical errors made by authors either as a simple slip-up or by a lack of thorough research.

As someone who likes technical details, yet also good fiction, I wondered how an author strikes a balance between thoroughness and good flowing prose. As writers, we need to keep readers interested in the story and the characters. I feel, however, that writers need to strive to be as correct as possible when they include certain researched things.

A recent example of an almost excessive amount of technical detail I’ve encountered, was Franklin Horton’s apocalyptic novel, The Borrowed World. He includes in some scenes very detailed descriptions of the characters’ guns and gear, this being a story about survival. To be clear, I am a firearms enthusiast and I participate in sport shooting, yet I found some of the detail being a bit unnecessary. (You can read my review here)

This topic really interests me, so I decided to ask some other authors for their opinions on the matter.

K.M. Weiland (@KMWeiland), from helpingwritersbecomeauthors.com, who writes historical and speculative fiction, had the following to say:

My goal is always to be as thorough as possible in my research upfront. As I’m then writing, I’ll bold any issue about which I’m uncertain so I can research it more particularly. And whenever possible, I try to get an expert to read my work over.

After that, I just have to let it go, hope I got 90% of my facts right, and let the chips fall where they may.

Joseph R. Lallo (@jrlallo), probably most well known for the Book of Deacon trilogy and whose steampunk novel, Free Wrench, I reviewed (find my review here), said:

I absolutely feel that a writer needs to get the research right. I don’t think it makes a difference which genre you write, the facts need to be solid. Obviously historic fiction and things set in the real world need to ring true, because people can check your facts. In sci-fi, everything should have at least a basic connection with reality, if only as a jumping off point. And even in fantasy, the more reality you can fold it, the better. Even the things you have created from scratch and don’t need to conform to reality should still be consistent, so I spend a lot of time going over my earlier stories in a setting to make sure the rules don’t change. As a writer, your job is to let your readers get lost in your stories. When you don’t get something quite right, that’s a surefire way to knock someone out of the tale.

And last but not least, I consulted another author, my very own brother, Stefan Fouché (@Fouche97) who blogs over at noveltray.wordpress.com. I spoke to him via Skype so there’s no text to quote. Nevertheless he emphasised the importance of researching properly and being thorough when you include technical information. Story, however, is most important and both he and I agree that your writing shouldn’t bore your readers with excessive info dumping.

So there it is, more than just my own opinion on research and the specificity of the details a writer should include. Overall it seems that correctness of the details is pretty important and that the amount of information a writer includes, should not detract from the reader’s experience.

I would like to conclude with a big thank you to all three of the authors who very kindly shared their opinions with me, although I kind of think Stefan is obligated to do so as he’s my brother. 😉



Borrowed world coverWho doesn’t love a good apocalyptic thriller? I know I do and a while ago I read this interesting take on it by Franklin Horton. To summarize the plot, a terrorist attack causes a major collapse in the United States and our characters are stranded away from home and have to find a way back.

I call this an interesting take, as usually the genre is filled with things like zombies, aliens or nuclear disaster. Mr Horton opted rather to take a more realistic approach and I enjoyed it.

The book is well researched on a technical level. Lots of firearms are featured (which I liked, being a gun enthusiast) as well as a lot of survivalist-type gear and mindsets with some characters. At some points, however, the technical information felt a bit excessive and unnecessary, but it beats a book filled with lots of technical errors (for all other thriller authors reading this, a magazine is NOT a clip).

Overall I would recommend this book to people who like reading thrillers and apocalyptic type books. I also know that preppers will love it.

(To check it out on amazon, click here)